But it’s still not the fantastic notebook solution that OO could be with properly implemented filtering. Not as good as the windows version, but not too bad. Obviously Omni has their own ideas about how this should be implemented, but Is there any place on the forums where a discussion that includes users views’ would be appropriate? Will one be able see the filtered items in context? Of course it could get messy with too much context. How filtering is implemented could make a huge difference though. ![]() CPN was the best, but OO could be better. I can tell you that it’s maddening to people in my scientific field that with hundreds of note-taking software, there’s really nothing that works all that well for a running notebook. This is an area that is really lacking in note-taking software. That definitely could bring OO a CPN replacement, or even more importantly, an excellent solution for keeping running logbooks/notebooks/etc. That would probably be my direction to go for a fast and light-weight log Wow, that’s great news. via #tag:… codes, and subsequent search + filter options on them. I would wish that Markdown editors would support rapid tagging, e.g. This all may likely still not address your key need … fast (outlining) input with efficient tagging. Finally, the upcoming Curiota 2 promises to have improvements to get things in to Curio in a faster and more organized manner. I also started a thread about Curio as a replacement for CPN. Of course, being able to dump that input in to Curio to process (layout, develop, and present) would be the next logical step for me.įWIW, I did ask about tagging in the Curio forums. I too might cherish a light-weight “front end” to Curio, where I could collect my thoughts rapidly in an outline format and tag them actively as I went along. As proficient as I am in using it, I appreciate the distinction you have made. Curio is an app for brainstorming, idea layout and development, and presentation. There are non-conforming edge cases for all the above.OO is lightweight and fast for writing/maintaining outlines Curio is less so.The basic question would be “after all that work, to recreate a representation in Tinderbox of all your tags, is the work going to prove worthwhile.”.Get the Second Brain Quickstart Guide to start building your Second Brain. So you would have to go back to DEVONthink are rearrange things. A Proven Method to Organize Your Digital Life and Unlock Your Creative Potential. The two applications do not synchronize that way. If you move around, make new hierarchies, etc., the notes in Tinderbox that represent tags in DEVONthink that activity will change nothing in DEVONthink.If you a have tags hierarchies in DEVONthink then you’ll have to figure a way (such as using containers) to represent that hierarchy in Tinderbox.Create a note in Tinderbox and add the “item link” for a single tag from DEVONthink to that note in Tinderbox.If you want to organize your tags using Tinderbox, then you have to create notes with a one-to-one correspondence to your tags in DEVONthink.A note in Tinderbox can point to one thing in DEVONthink – either a tag / group, or a document stored in a tag / group.Tinderbox containers may look or behave somewhat like folders, but they are not folders. But hey are not the same as notes in Tinderbox. Tags and groups (folders) in DEVONthink are the same thing.(If its impossible, i understand that too.) the first one is way more important to me! thanks! ![]() If that makes no sense, please ignore the second question. (my impression is that it is possible using agents?) but if i drag an article from DT tagged w/ a, i would like to see the note w/in container a. i’d like to just see a and b linked on a map with some indication (on the outline as well) that b is a’s child. ![]() But what I need help with is this part - can I drag a note into tinderbox and have it automatically become part of the containers that correspond with its tags? is this the best way to do this? I’m writing a book, and the ultimate goal is to see how all the tags relate to each other and which documents fall w/in them as I’m writing.Īnother much less important question - is there a way to see on a map a heirachy of all the tag names w/o using the container view – in other words, not having to open a container to see the children/grandchildren – but still using the individual tags as containers for the articles they include? so if a is the parent to b, i would prefer to not see b w/in container a. just creating a note/container for every tag on my own. I would like to organize them in TB, which I can do manually, e.g. I have read a lot but am still really trying to figure out TB and know basically nothing, so excuse me in advance. Hi, I just started using TB but have a long history with DT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |